Author: Jon Ostrower

  • Bombardier hints at Odyssey CSeries order

    BA-Privatair-CS100-Crop_560.jpg
    As part of its PrivatAir CSeries CS100 order announced yesterday, Bombardier provided a significant allusion to one of its unannounced customers.

    “Included among the 11 customers that have selected the CSeries aircraft are major network carriers, national carriers, premium airlines serving city centre airports, a low-cost airline, leasing companies and now, with the order from PrivatAir announced today, a full service provider to airline partners,” said Philippe Poutissou, Vice President, Marketing, Bombardier Commercial Aircraft. 

    The orders are indicated as follows: Firm orders for Republic Airways, Lufthansa, Lease Corporation International, Korean Air, Braathens Aviation, an unidentified major network carrier, an unidentified European customer, a well-established, unidentified airline, and letters of intent from Atlasjet and Ilyushin Finance.
    With PrivatAir specifically not included in its list of operator descriptions above, Bombardier appears to be tipping its hand about its prospects for already having secured a premium configured CSeries operating out of a city center airport, like that of London City, which sounds an awful lot like the rumoured Odyssey Airlines.
    Photo Credit Bombardier

    This post was originally published to the internet between 2007 and 2012. Links, images, and embedded media from that era may no longer function as intended.

    This post originally appeared at Flightglobal.com from 2007 to 2012.

  • Photo of Note: A juxtaposition of transportation safety and professionalism

    At yesterday’s Airbus Training Center event, professionalism and transportation safety kept coming up as a topic of conversation and how it remains the centerpiece for maintaining the integrity of global transit. While it wasn’t mentioned explicitly, these were the two pictures that kept coming to mind.

    Submitted without further comment.

    1459-Concordia.jpg

    This post was originally published to the internet between 2007 and 2012. Links, images, and embedded media from that era may no longer function as intended.

    This post originally appeared at Flightglobal.com from 2007 to 2012.

  • Flutter concern prompts 747-8 tail fuel tank deactivation

    Lufthansa Boeing 747-8I D-ABYE/N6067U RC021

    Its first delivery of the 747-8 Intercontinental internally slated for February, Boeing is locking out the tail fuel tanks of its new jumbo after a structural flutter was found to occur in the event of a certain structural fitting failure. FULL STORY

    “Boeing certified the 747-8 Intercontinental with the tail fuel tanks locked out because during design review of flight test data…it was discovered that, under a certain regulatory-required structural failure scenario, the airplane can experience flutter events when the fuel tanks in the horizontal stabiliser are filled over 15% of their capacity,” said Boeing.

    To comply with US Federal Aviation Administration regulations, Boeing will deactivate the tail fuel system to satisfy the requirement that no structural flutter be present in the airframe after any single failure condition.

    “These conditions do not present themselves when the tanks are empty,” Boeing said of the structural failure evaluations, which were only found to occur if the aircraft’s wing-to-strut join fitting had failed.

    The “requirement for all key structural fittings…need to have a design tolerant of ‘any single failure’”, said Boeing. “We’re actively working on ways to activate the fuel tanks for the long term.”

    The lock-out will be achieved through the pulling of a circuit breaker and the physical disconnection and capping of fuel lines running to the horizontal stabilizers’ 3,300gal tanks.

    Boeing says the restriction will shave 300-400nm off the range of the VIP configured 747-8 and will have little impact to the airline configured aircraft, as tail fuel usage is precluded if the non-fuel weight exceeds 60% of the aircraft’s maximum structural payload. In such a situation, the fuel payload would be entirely carried by the wing tanks.
    Boeing recently updated, then removed – pending review – its 747-8 and -8F maxiumum structural payload and operating empty weight (OEW) weights:

    The document listed the maximum structural payload for the passenger configured model as 82.1t (181,000lb) and the pre-service bulletin for the 747-8F at 134t (295,200lb), which increased after April’s update to 139t (306,000lb).

    47-8 airline launch customer Lufthansa says, “For our mission profile it’s not a problem at the moment,” adding the tail fuel restriction would not restrict the aircraft’s deployment on its initial routes, which have not yet been announced. 
    “Of course you want an airplane that can run as long as possible” in unrestricted operation, it added.

    This post was originally published to the internet between 2007 and 2012. Links, images, and embedded media from that era may no longer function as intended.

    This post originally appeared at Flightglobal.com from 2007 to 2012.

  • Video: Airbus fly-by-wire control stick meets Brazilian landscape

    MIAMI — I’m here in Florida for the next two days for an Airbus simulator training that will explore the European airframer’s digital fly-by-wire philosophy, which has oft been a point of discussion about the role of computers and the role of pilots in flying. 

    For Airbus, fly-by-wire has resulted in hard limits on the aircraft flight envelope, preventing over-speeding, stalling, and over-banking of the aircraft. The maximum bank allowed is 67-deg, with nose-down pitch not exceeding 15-deg and a 2.5g limit. An auto-thrust system complements the A-floor protection by automatically spooling up the engines, limiting nose up pitch (angle of attack) to prevent the aircraft from stalling and providing best climb performance.

    Those philosophical discussions, both of which diverge and converge amongst commercial aircraft manufacturers, have guided aircraft development for three decades now, with some implementation of fly-by-wire included on every single new aircraft in development. The systems have evolved from simply providing a flight control input all the way to being the basis for structural design through limiting loads on an airframe.
    The video above shows the technology in action aboard an A320 family aircraft operating around South America in routine operation and presented in rather dramatic fashion. 

    This post was originally published to the internet between 2007 and 2012. Links, images, and embedded media from that era may no longer function as intended.

    This post originally appeared at Flightglobal.com from 2007 to 2012.

  • ANA’s 787 set to be tested with January service expansion (Update1)

    All Nippon Airways Boeing 787 Dreamliner JA801A ZA101

    Over the next two weeks, the 787 will add four new destinations, including its first international long-haul route, aided by a growing number of deliveries from Boeing.

    The 787’s first two and a half months in service have provided a light trial with a only four daily flights with two aircraft and a combined 325min of flying between the Haneda Airport in the Japanese capital and Hiroshima and Okayama. Those light operations have yielded a 96.3% dispatch reliability, compared to 96.5% for ANA’s total operations. 

    The only deviation of note during the first months of service was the November 6 incident in which the landing gear failed to deploy on the first attempt while on approach to Okayama.
    As Boeing and ANA have closely tended to the first two 787s, the expansion of 787 services will provide the aircraft’s first major test.
    UPDATE 4:42 PM ET:PianoX performance analysis of the deployment the 787 on these regional routes indicates that the inherent nature of the aircraft’s long-range configuration means ANA is far from yielding the benefits of Boeing’s touted 20% improvement in fuel efficiency over the 767.

    The B787-8 is used by ANA in domestic and regional service over distances of 300 to 1200 nm (HND-OKJ, HND-PEK). Such usage is ill-matched to intrinsic design-sizing considerations for this aircraft. For example, when carrying 25 tonnes over 1000 nm the B787-8 burns approximately 10.6 tonnes of fuel (and more for early deliveries with acknowledged performance shortfalls). In contrast, a B757-300W is better sized to carry the same payload over the same distance, burning merely 8.6 tonnes despite its senescence, albeit at economy-class comfort levels (no deterioration, best engine option). The B767-300ERW burns 10.3 tonnes under the same circumstances. The factual significance and operational reality of such (counter-expectational) mission-specific fuel burns can appear negated or reversed through contrived definitions of efficiency metrics based on point conditions. 

    Further, the analysis suggests that on the coming long-range route to Frankfurt, ANA will only yield a 1.2% fuel burn advantage with the 787 compared to a new 767-300ER with winglets.
    The coming expansion is aided by recent deliveries to the airline, including the December 30 handover of Airplane 31, the first 158-seat long-haul configured aircraft and the January 12 delivery of the fourth, Airplane 41. The fifth delivery, Airplane 9, likely taking place today, says a program source, will expand the 264-seat regionally configured fleet to four aircraft. 

    The airline will begin its first international service between Haneda and Beijing on 14 January, followed by services on 17 and 18 January and its first long-haul flight between Tokyo Narita airport and Frankfurt, Germany on 21 January.
    Domestic operations are set to expand on the Okayama and Hiroshima routes on 13 January, moving from one to two flights per day.
    ANA will begin Haneda flights to Yamaguchi Ube and Itami (Osaka) from 23 January.
    After the commencement of its 2012 fiscal year on 1 April, ANA will add Haneda to Matuyama and Narita to Seattle and San Jose, California.
    The Beijing route will be initially operated with a international long-haul configuration on January 14, 17 and 18 before moving to the Frankfurt flight, which will be flown daily with 787 as of March 1, alternating between 777-200ER and 787 service from January 21 after delivery delays in November and December slowed the introduction.

    This post was originally published to the internet between 2007 and 2012. Links, images, and embedded media from that era may no longer function as intended.

    This post originally appeared at Flightglobal.com from 2007 to 2012.

  • A correction, clarification and explanation of early A350 production

    First A350 XWB Section 15

    Since September, structural parts for the first two A350-900s have traversed the Atlantic ocean and the European continent on their way through Airbus’s most distributed commercial supply chain.

    Monday, Spirit AeroSystems delivered its first center fuselage from its St. Nazaire, France facility to Airbus’s facility pre-final assembly next door. The handover marked the first time on a new Airbus aircraft that a non-EADS company has supplied major structure for a first unit.
    Following the build-up of parts and their transition from the airframer’s wholly-owned and independent structural suppliers has at times been challenging, while understanding the sequencing of the aircraft’s early production.
    With the static test airframe, MSN5000, scheduled to be the first A350 to enter final assembly later this quarter, the first deliveries by Spirit, Aerolia and Premium Aerotec to Airbus were in fact MSN1, which will be the first A350-900 to fly. 
    Airbus and Spirit confirmed yesterday that while the first forward fuselage section to arrive in Toulouse for final assembly was for MSN5000, as noted last month, that structure was delivered is actually the second to pass through the St. Nazaire site after the first deliveries of parts for MSN1. 
    The reason, explained Airbus, is MSN1 will spend longer in pre-final assembly for systems installation and says MSN5000’s passing the first A350 to fly on its way to Toulouse is “fully in accordance with the planning.”
    Flight deck structure (Section 11-12) from Aerolia was delivered in September, followed by transfer of the MSN1 center fuselage panels (Section 15) from Kinston, North Carolina to Spirit’s St. Nazaire facility in October and the first forward barrel (Section 13-14) from Premium Aerotec in November to Hamburg for systems installation. This page incorrectly noted that those deliveries had been for MSN5000 and have since been corrected.
    The second shipments from Aerolia and Premium Aerotec for MSN5000 were joined together in early December before the end of the month handover to Toulouse. The Premium Aerotec Section 13-14 for MSN5000 bypassed Hamburg for systems installation completely as they weren’t required for the static airframe.
    Spirit’s second unit, MSN5000 or ES, has begun partial build up in St. Nazaire, the aerostructures manufacturer explains:
    The Crown Panel, Left Lateral Panel and Right Lateral Panel (also known as the Upper Shell when assembled) for MSN5000 have been shipped to Spirit’s St. Nazaire assembly center and is in work there. The Forward Lower Shell and Left and Right Lateral Junction Panels for MSN5000 are still in Kinston and will ship to our St. Nazaire facility later this month.
    Tailcone.jpeg
    Further, MSN1’s Section 19, the A350’s tail cone, was shipped in December from Getafe, Spain to Hamburg for build up with the Section 16-18 panels. That aft section’s side panels and floor grids are fabricated by Premium Aerotec and shipped to EADS in Hamburg for integration, but it is not known if they have been delivered. 
    Photos Credit Spirit AeroSystems & Airbus

    This post was originally published to the internet between 2007 and 2012. Links, images, and embedded media from that era may no longer function as intended.

    This post originally appeared at Flightglobal.com from 2007 to 2012.

  • Legendary Grumman test pilot Bob Smyth dies at 84

    I received word this morning of the passing of legendary Grumman test pilot Robert “Bob” Smyth. Smyth, 84, was responsible for an extraordinary contribution to civil and military aeronautics and astronautics.
    After leaving the US Navy as a pilot in the Grumman F8F Bearcat, Vought F4U Corsair and McDonnell F2H Banshee and de Havilland 112 Venom, Smyth joined Grumman Aircraft Engineering in 1955. Smyth served as assistant project pilot of the Gulfstream I, consulting pilot and astronaut liaison to NASA on the Lunar Excursion Module during the Apollo program.
    Smyth was at the controls for the first flights of the Grumman A2F (later the A-6A Intruder) and captured the experience in 2001, writing:

    Now, the real purpose of a first flight is to make a successful landing. There is a tremendous level of interest at this point. Hundreds of people have worked long hours for months to reach this point; a large part of the company’s future is tied to the airplane’s success; and the customer is anxious to see what he’s buying. All this creates a great deal of pressure on all concerned. One person has it within his power to bring instant relief to all hands: the lucky guy who gets to make the first flight.

    His career spanned an extraordinary variety of aircraft, being the first to fly the Gullfstream II and as chief Grumman test pilot, flew the F-14A for the first time in 1970. Smyth left Grumman and joined Gulfstream Aerospace in 1981 and retired as vice president of flight operations in 1993.
    Smyth spoke to the Smithsonian’s National Air and Space Museum in 2007, discussing his incredible career and his indelible contribution to aerospace in the video above.
    Smyth passed away yesterday at his home in Florida and is survived by his wife, Sally, and two sons, Robert and Andy.

    This post was originally published to the internet between 2007 and 2012. Links, images, and embedded media from that era may no longer function as intended.

    This post originally appeared at Flightglobal.com from 2007 to 2012.

  • Photos of Note: The past and present of Russian aerospace

    Il76-static-Sator_560.jpeg

    RosK-Factory-Sator_560.jpg

    SSJ100-FAL-1-Dolya_560.jpg

    SSJ100-FAL-2-Dolya_560.jpg

    Last week brought an odd re-occurring pattern of sorts: Different people, from very different places pointed me toward two different photographers who both captured the past and present of Russian aerospace in a series of extraordinarily detailed and artistically poignant photo essays. This page in the past has explored the immediate post-Soviet era in commercial air transport, though photographers Lana Sator and Sergey Dolya each have taken another step in telling that story, illustrating both the decay and fledgling rebirth of the country’s aerospace industry.

    Sator strolled effortlessly into a former Soviet Roscosmos missile factory and what appears to be a facility once used by Illuyshin for static testing, while Dolya explores – in extraordinary  detail – the process of fabricating and assembling the new Sukhoi Superjet in at the company’s facilities in Komsomolsk-on-Amur. Dolya, with the apparent permission of Sukhoi, brings to life the first metal cut for each aircraft all the way through final assembly to the flight line in what must be bordering on proprietary detail. In lieu of a moving Movie Monday, the 200 photos should occupy the eye for quite a while.
    Photos Credit Lana Sator & Sergey Dolya

    This post was originally published to the internet between 2007 and 2012. Links, images, and embedded media from that era may no longer function as intended.

    This post originally appeared at Flightglobal.com from 2007 to 2012.

  • Bombardier looks ahead to a year-end CSeries first flight

    BA-CIASTA-Interior_900.jpg
    “It’ll fly when it’s ready”, as goes the perennial line from aerospace leaders about the maiden flight of new aircraft.
    In a wide-ranging interview yesterday, Stephen Trimble and myself sat down with CSeries vice president and general manager Rob Dewar, covering what’s ahead as the CS100, the aircraft maker’s first clean sheet commercial aircraft design, pushes toward its goal of flying at the end of 2012 and entering service late next year with its undisclosed launch customer.
    The margin for error is gone, acknowledged Commercial Aerospace president Guy Hachey, during October’s National Business Aviation Association in Las Vegas, so hitting every note over the next 24 months is the path to meeting the schedule. Though CEO Pierre Beaudoin says a three to six month slip to the first half of 2014 falls within the realm of acceptable delays.
    CIASTA – the Complete Integrated Aircraft Systems Test Area – Bombardier’s “iron bird” began commissioning systems late in December, with its Aircraft 0 beginning tests on the pedestal, throttle quadrant and FADEC software. That activation is the first of many systems that will come to life inside CIASTA over the first quarter of this year. 
    What makes CIASTA different from other “iron bird” systems integration rigs is Bombardier’s emphasis on having every non-fuel system running inside the building. On one side of the facility, accounting for 90% of the aircraft’s systems, is the hydraulics, avionics, electrics and primary flight controls, known as the Integrated Systems Test and Certification Rig (ISTCR). 
    On the other, a complete cabin systems and Environmental Control System (ECS) demonstrator with pressurization, heating, cooling, lighting and cabin management systems, accompanied by smaller test laboratories and a CAE-supplied engineering simulator.
    The on-site expansiveness exceeds that of both the Boeing’s 787 Integrated Test Vehicle (ITV) (pdf) and Airbus’s Aircraft 0 iron bird
    “This is really the first time someone has really made sure we integrated all the systems, all the software in a real aircraft production configuration in one building,” said Dewar, who says 4,800h of testing are planned for the facility.
    In short, CIASTA is a structureless reproduction of the the CS100.
    BA-CIASTA_900.jpg
    Moving toward production of the first “structured” CS100, the static test airframe will be first to inaugurate its final assembly facilities, which will eventually be sized for a rate of 20 aircraft per month or one aircraft per manufacturing day. The center wing box for that aircraft, called the Complete Aircraft Static (CAS) test article has been delivered to its Belfast, Northern Ireland facility.
    At Mirabel Airport’s final assembly line, Dewar says the plastic comes off of the first set of tooling next week and all its tools will be in place later in the quarter. 
    After the static airframe, Bombardier will build five test aircraft dubbed its Flight Test Vehicles (FTV). FTV1 will be the first 100 to 125-seat CS100 to fly around year’s end, kicking off a 2,400h flight test program. Part of its certification trials will include a 180min extended operations (ETOPS) certification for over-water flights, such as those connecting London City Airport and New York.
    Such a mission was part of the initial requirements for the CSeries, and the aircraft maker confirmed it is in “advanced discussions” with a customer for an all-business class layout.
    The CS300, due in 2014, will add two additional FTVs for certification of the stretched jet.
    With its late-2013 first handover planned, CSeries production will see a gradual ramp up, delivering 40 aircraft in 2014, 80 in 2015 and 120 in 2016. Delivery slots for 2014 and 2015 are both sold out and 2016’s positions are 60% booked.
    Photos Credit Bombardier

    This post was originally published to the internet between 2007 and 2012. Links, images, and embedded media from that era may no longer function as intended.

    This post originally appeared at Flightglobal.com from 2007 to 2012.

  • Boeing books 805 commercial orders, delivers 477 in 2011

    British Airways Cargo Boeing 747-8F G-GSSE RC575

    Boeing has reported its orders and delivery totals for 2011, confirming the 9 747-8 and 3 787 deliveries in 2011. In addition, the company reports that 737 Max commitments have topped 1,000 from 15 customers, though still holds only one firm order for 150 from Southwest Airlines, which receives its first re-engined 737 in fourth quarter 2017. Boeing also added 25 new 787 orders to its backlog from an unidentified customer, lifting the total program orders to the positive for 2011.

     

    Gross Orders    Net Orders    Deliveries    Unfilled Orders   
     
    737  625 551 372 2,365
    747   7 -1 9 97
    767 42 42 20 72
    777 202 200 73 380
    787 45 13 3 857
     
      921 805 477 3771

    This post was originally published to the internet between 2007 and 2012. Links, images, and embedded media from that era may no longer function as intended.

    This post originally appeared at Flightglobal.com from 2007 to 2012.