With all the discussion about getting 787 to fly, it is often forgotten that preparations have been well underway for years preparing the aircraft for airline service. However, as those preparations have stretched on two and a half years longer than expected, technology has continued to advance and changing trends inside the cabin have necessitated additional development to stay current.
My colleague, aircraft cabin connectivity expert, Mary Kirby, reports that Boeing is under pressure to select a connectivity solution for the 787.
“There is a lot of things that Boeing is trying to do to deliver it
[the 787] on time but the overwhelming and loud feedback from the
customer is ‘you have to address this issue [in-flight connectivity]
and you have to do it very quickly’,” reveals David Bruner,
vice-president, global communications services for Panasonic, which is
supplying in-flight entertainment hardware for 787 customers in
addition to Thales.Boeing famously failed in its own attempt to
create a sustainable business model for airborne high-speed Internet in
the form of Ku-band satellite-based Connexion by Boeing, which was
switched off in the commercial sector at the end of 2006.With
regard to the 787, Boeing confirms that it has not selected its
in-flight connectivity solution. “We are in the process of an extensive
trade study on this subject at this time,” says a Boeing spokeswoman.The
airframer is exploring Ku offerings in addition to solutions that use
Inmarsat’s SwiftBroadband (SBB) aeronautical service over L-band
satellites, according to IFEC industry players.“I was amazed
because I thought they’d say ‘it’s going to be two or three years and
we’ll look at it [connectivity] again’, but they’ve rekindled the
effort with us and other providers to ask – ‘what is the right answer
for this aircraft’,” says Bruner.
In addition, some 787 customer have been invited back to the Dreamliner Gallery to see view new cabin offerings. Continental Airlines, for example, was invited back to Boeing to review its cabin selections, but says it made no changes to its plans for the 787s on order, says Brian Roland, engineering project manager for the airline.
No word yet on whether or not other airlines shifted their original choices for the cabins on their 787s. However, if you ask Mary Kirby, I’d bet she’d say that the connectivity selection could change this quite a bit.
This post was originally published to the internet between 2007 and 2012. Links, images, and embedded media from that era may no longer function as intended.
This post originally appeared at Flightglobal.com from 2007 to 2012.