Blog

  • The arrival of JAL’s first 787 prompts a tangle of delivery dates

    Japan Airlines Boeing 787 Dreamliner JA822A/N1003W ZA177

    Sometimes the only thing that’s clear is that nothing is clear.
    The Seattle Times reports this morning that Boeing is still struggling with the 787 and the massive amount of rework that is taking place all over Paine Field, including at rapidly growing Boeing ATS now dubbed “factory south”. The goal of delivering 12 to 20 787s this year “It isn’t going to happen,” says one mechanic doing the rework.
    Small indications had been cropping up in recent weeks that things were again beginning to slip, including, but not limited to, the interior completion date and return to flight for ZA102 moving from mid-April to early-May. Though, another set of confusing data points illustrates the uncertainty that exists between Boeing suppliers, its second 787 customer Japan Airlines and even inside its own production system.
    • According to the internal planning guided by Boeing’s Z23 schedule, JAL will get its first 787 in October, making it the launch customer for the GEnx engine. 
    • One top executive at a major 787 supplier told me at MRO Americas that he had spoken to Boeing just the day before and that his company’s product was entering service with JAL in November.
    • A third source, close to the airline itself, says JAL expecting its first in December. 
    So, when is JAL getting Airplane 23, which is currently in San Antonio for rework
    Three different targets from three different sources. The only thing that’s clear is that no one, perhaps even Boeing, is really sure when the Japanese carrier is getting its first 787s and just how many of those 12 to 20 Dreamliners will be in the hands of customers this year.

    This post was originally published to the internet between 2007 and 2012. Links, images, and embedded media from that era may no longer function as intended.

    This post originally appeared at Flightglobal.com from 2007 to 2012.

  • Open Thread: What questions do you have for Boeing?

    On Wednesday morning, Boeing CEO Jim McNerney and CFO James Bell will host the company’s first quarterly earnings call for 2011. For those of you unfamiliar with the format, the second half of the call is devoted to questions from industry analysts and the media. I’m looking forward to asking a question during the call, but I’m quite curious about the questions you all have for the aerospace giant and two of its top executive officers?

    Sound off.

    This post was originally published to the internet between 2007 and 2012. Links, images, and embedded media from that era may no longer function as intended.

    This post originally appeared at Flightglobal.com from 2007 to 2012.

  • Movie Monday – April 25 – Flying Lockheed’s P-38 Lightning

    This week’s Movie Monday, comes from the extensive youtube aviation film archive contains a 35 minute 1943 training film on the flight characteristics of the Lockheed P-38 Lightning. The twin-engine fighter saw service in World War II and was one of the famed creations of Lockheed’s Kelly Johnson. This film was produced in the same vein as the North American P-51A and Messerschmitt Me-262 films that have also been posted to this page. 

    The video covers normal precautions, single-engine aircraft handling, landing gear and flap emergency extensions and bailout techniques. This video is not a high-level look at the aircraft, but a detailed technical look its survivability training techniques for its pilots. Enjoy!

    This post was originally published to the internet between 2007 and 2012. Links, images, and embedded media from that era may no longer function as intended.

    This post originally appeared at Flightglobal.com from 2007 to 2012.

  • Video of Note: China Southern’s first 787 leaves the paint shop

    Ubiquitous Paine Field spotter Matt Cawby captured China Southern’s first 787 making its way from the paint hanger to the long-term storage ramp over at Future of Flight. This particular aircraft, the 34th 787 built (fatigue and static airframes notwithstanding), came through the global production system over the past eight months, having been spotted in the form of its winglets in South Korea to final body join in Everett. ZA380, which is registered B-2725, is slated for delivery to China Southern late this year. Next new customer out of the factory is expected to be Ethiopian Airlines with Airplane 39.

    This post was originally published to the internet between 2007 and 2012. Links, images, and embedded media from that era may no longer function as intended.

    This post originally appeared at Flightglobal.com from 2007 to 2012.

  • NLRB complaint points to 787 surge line’s coming permanency

    CHS-PAE-FAL_560.jpgReading between the lines of the National Labor Relations Board complaint against Boeing, it becomes clear that the foundations for the settlement between Boeing and the IAM may be self-evident in the form of the eventual permanency of the coming 787 surge line.
    The NLRB alleges Boeing violated the National Labor Relations Act by placing the second 787 final assembly line in North Charleston, South Carolina as a retaliatory action for the fall 2008 strike that shutdown jetliner production for 57-days.
    Boeing refutes the claim, however the NLRB cites comments to the Seattle Times by Boeing Commercial Airplane CEO Jim Albaugh regarding labor as the overriding factor in the decision. Additionally, Boeing airplane programs vice president Pat Shanahan (also cited in the NLRB complaint) told this page in June 2009 – ahead of the decision – that labor relations, not economic geography, was guiding the decision.

    Shanahan declined to specify what locations were on the “short list” for a second 787 production line, but said there are “lots of geographical options…the real options are around ‘how do you secure assurance of delivery?’ And I think that’s been a discussion topic around some of the disruption we’ve realized…at Boeing.”

    The disruption Shanahan referenced was the 57-day machinist strike that halted jetliner production at Boeing’s commercial manufacturing facilities during September and October of 2008.

    A vote to decertify the IAM from then-Boeing Charleston followed in September 2009 and was one the precursor to the final selection in October 2009, along with the collapse of talks between Boeing and the IAM. An IAM spokesman at the time alleged Boeing told employees that if they decertified the union Charleston would be selected for the second line, a claim Boeing denies. Whether it was organized by official elements or not, there was a whisper campaign that was well understood to be driving a lot of the arguments around the vote. 
    The eight-position Charleston horseshoe line (twice the size of the primary Everett line) is less than four months away from hosting the arrival of Airplane 46 for United Airlines, a milestone that is very likely to not be disrupted by the complaint as Boeing has vowed to “vigorously contest” any order.

    The NLRB acting general counsel says an amicable settlement avoiding costly litigation is ideal, with its own recommendation comes near the end of its announcement:

    To remedy the alleged unfair labor practices, the Acting General Counsel seeks an order that would require Boeing to maintain the second production line in Washington state. The complaint does not seek closure of the South Carolina facility, nor does it prohibit Boeing from assembling planes there.

    The truth is, Boeing is already building a second 787 final assembly line and it will be operational in early 2012 and will provide temporary surge capacity to support the ramp up along side the primary Everett Building 40-26 line and the Charleston 88-30 line. This page reported in December that Boeing was investigating rates 70% higher than its 2013 goals that will rely heavily on the surge line:

    That acceleration, say factory sources, may extend well beyond today’s 2013 goal to build 10 787s per month, with rises as high as 17 per month being investigated for mid-2016. That significant boost, beyond today’s unprecedented target, which calls for the planned Everett surge line, which aims for operation by early 2012, to be made permanent.

    While the surge line is likely to be at the center of any settlement, such an agreement made under duress only reinforces the us vs. them relationship between Boeing and its government and labor stakeholders. Don’t forget, the 2012 IAM contract negotiations sit between here and Boeing’s 10 aircraft per month goal in 2013. This event may have set the tone for the discussion at the negotiation table.

    This post was originally published to the internet between 2007 and 2012. Links, images, and embedded media from that era may no longer function as intended.

    This post originally appeared at Flightglobal.com from 2007 to 2012.

  • A tale of two factories: Boeing set to expand 787 mod operation

    DSC_0064a

    Boeing is advancing toward full-activation of what it sees as a second 787 factory at its Everett, Washington facility, one designed to incorporate the aircraft’s final certified configuration into dozens of Dreamliners already built, in a methodical move to convert billions of dollars of production inventory into cash for itself and its supplier partners and revenue generating aircraft for its customers.

    By mid-year, Boeing will occupy all five bays inside Aviation Technical Services’ (ATS) Hangar Three, the largest of three buildings operated by the Paine Field-based maintenance, repair and overhaul provider.

    The scale of the ATS operation comes as another in a series of industrial expansions for a program whose footprint looks significantly different from the one the company envisioned when it first was established.

    Additionally, the $12.9 billion in 787 inventory that the company ended 2010 with continues to grow at a rate of approximately $500 million per month, according to its full-year earnings report, underscoring the massive costs already invested in the program and spread across 35 saleable aircraft in Everett and those aft and center fuselages in process in South Carolina, as aircraft arrive at final assembly at a rate of two per month.

    Few details about the company’s plans for the ramping up modification work at ATS are officially confirmed, though in a recent interview Pat Shanahan, Boeing vice president of airplane programs acknowledged the growing scope of the MRO provider for its 787 modification plans:

    “We’ll have two separate factories,” he says, adding “So its really like we have…a primary assembly facility and a mod facility in Everett, so it’s not like we’re going to have a bunch of people out on the flight line moving part by part into the airplane.”

    Program sources briefed on the plans for ATS say what Boeing has devised is a systematic approach to tackling the 140,000 unfinished tasks left remaining on the fleet.

    Boeing’s new general in the fight for deliverable 787s is Tim Coyle, who was responsible for integrating Vought and Global Aeronautica into Boeing South Carolina, now home to the second 787 final assembly line.

    Once fully activated in late June, say those same sources, Boeing will operate five slant bays at ATS, east to west numerically designated one through five. Eventually each bay will be designated with a unique task, focusing on structures, wiring, systems, interiors, finishing and aqueous wash and aircraft closeout, with a three shift staff expected to be more than 1,200.

    Speaking generally, Shanahan says “we’re coming up with new approaches to get those airplanes that have to go through change incorporation on the 87, to even do it more quickly.”

    Declining to confirm the details of the ATS expansion, Boeing says, “We currently have four airplanes at the ATS facility. The space at ATS is being used for modifications and completions of early-production 787s. Our plan is flexible and will accomodate our production needs as we complete flight test and prepare airplanes for delivery.”

    Jeff Salee, ATS marketing and public relations manager, declined to say how long Boeing would be occupying Hangar Three, citing contractual confidentiality, however he says only company office personnel remain in the facility and will be moved to nearby Hangars One and Two.

    Shanahan says the bay that formerly housed the company’s 767 line will remain empty for the time being, where Boeing will “move [787s] inside that main factory…then prep them to go install the new configuration and we use that ATS facility to do all of that work.”

    By early 2012, the vacant area of Building 40-24 will be replaced with the Everett surge final assembly line, intended to advance the airframer’s output to 10 aircraft per month by the end of 2013, along with the North Charleston factory coming online mid-year with a contribution of three aircraft per month.

    With the latest configuration standards program sources say Boeing will be able to eliminate more than 30,000 of the outstanding jobs on the unfinished 787s by nullifying the planned structural, systems and software changes to the originally built aircraft, and implementing a wholesale wiring change – believed to be dubbed NC7 – bringing each up to a deliverable standard.

    Along with ATS Hangar Three, Boeing activated its San Antonio facility in March, with Airplane 23, the first 787 for Japan Airlines, the first aircraft to go through change incorporation in Texas.

    Currently, four of the earliest 787s slated for delivery per the Z23 schedule – Airplanes Seven, Eight, Nine and 24 – are sequestered at ATS in preparation for delivery, which is believed to be slated for July.

    This post was originally published to the internet between 2007 and 2012. Links, images, and embedded media from that era may no longer function as intended.

    This post originally appeared at Flightglobal.com from 2007 to 2012.

  • Sukhoi marks first Superjet delivery to Armavia

    97007 - Yuri Gagarin

    Fifty years and a week after Yuri Gagarin first orbited the Earth in Vostok 1, a new Russian commercial jetliner was delivered by Sukhoi bearing his name. The first production Sukhoi Superjet 100 was delivered to Armenian carrier Armavia at Zvartnots International Airport in the nation’s capital of Yerevan.
    The aircraft, line number seven, has been registered EK95015 for Armavia, which is expected to begin commercial service between Yerevan and Moscow in the next few says once the final registration is approved, reports Flightglobal’s Tom Zaitsev.
    The 100-seat jet differs from Russian jetliners the industry has seen before with significant western partnerships across the whole of the supply base and aftermarket support network as Superjet International – a joint venture between Sukhoi Civil Aircraft and Alenia Aeronautica – works to bring the SSJ100 to western markets. 

    The environmental and flight control systems are supplied by Liebherr, hydraulic system from Parker Hannafin, auxiliary power unit from Honeywell, Goodrich wheels, brakes and brake system controls, Messier-Dowty landing gear, Zodiac-Intertechnique fuel system and a PowerJet engine, a joint venture between Snecma and Russian engine maker Saturn NPO.

    Additionally, the Thales avionics are grounded on a foundation similar to the Airbus A380, says Superjet, with an Aircraft Full Duplex switched data network (AFDX) and Integrated Modular Avionics (IMA) core that exceeds its nearest competitors with full fly-by-wire architecture and RNP .3 precision navigation capability and CATIIIa autoland capability.

    Certifying and delivering the first SSJ is a major step for Superjet, though the next customer, Russian flag carrier Aeroflot, is less pleased with the SSJ100 in its current form. Aeroflot chairman and transport minister Igor Levitin was quoted last week as saying the aircraft did not meet the contractual technical specifications promised by Sukhoi and has asked the Russian government to fine the airframer as a result of the ongoing program delays. 
    How that situation is negotiated between the airline, the government and the airframer is already guided by the inherent political pressure that comes along with the Russian government’s desire to grow Sukhoi’s position in the global jetliner market, though the near-term challenge is how the SSJ navigates its entry into service, avoiding the struggles of its Eastern predecessors.

    This post was originally published to the internet between 2007 and 2012. Links, images, and embedded media from that era may no longer function as intended.

    This post originally appeared at Flightglobal.com from 2007 to 2012.

  • The A320neo strategy and the 767NG that will never be

    767-787-frame_560.jpg

    “In terms of the adaptation of the [A320neo], one of the things we’re trying to do to de-risk this program is very much focus on minimum change. And we are conscious because we’ve lots and lots of creative engineers. Our engineers love developing new ideas and developing new things, that’s what engineers want to do. Clearly if we’re not careful we could end up with a situation where this becomes an all new airplane, very, very easily, and so part of my job along with [Airbus A320 chief engineer Wolfgang Engler] and the team is to say that we have to have certain amount of realism into how we do this. We’re doing that because we want to keep a high degree of commonality, from a customer point of view, and because we want to have a de-risking in terms of the technical challenge of the program and a very fast ramp up.” – Tom Williams, Airbus executive vice president programmes

    It’s rare that I open a post solely with a quote, but the one above, from Airbus’s Tom Williams A320neo briefing, should offer – not a glimpse – but shines a spotlight into how the European airframer thinks about new products. The incremental DNA of Airbus – rooted in the same principles of Piepenbrock’s Red-Blue and those that brought the 737 Next Generation into existence – identifies the ingredients for bringing a product rapidly to market in a way that seeks to be non-disruptive to its production system and to its customer base. 
    It is in this same vein that we see Air Insight introduce its justification for a Next Generation 767, fitted with winglets, new engines, a KC-46A/787-style avionics and flight deck along with a new interior would provide a new commercial lease on life to Boeing’s high margin jet and a product for airlines that don’t need the 787-8’s 7,755nm design range.

    With the 767 already a major player in the transatlantic market, a 767NG would enable customers to maintain a great deal of fleet commonality and upgrade their medium range fleets with the NG while adding the 787 for their long-range operations. A fleet change is a traumatic event for an airline, with ramifications throughout the organization, including spares, MRO, and crew training. Upgrading a fleet maintains commonality and enables smoother, lower cost fleet transitions.

    Air Insight suggests such a product that is complimentary to the 787 with a theoretical 12% fuel burn improvement from new engines, plus a further 4.4% reduction from winglets boosts the range of a 767-300ER to nearly 7,000nm with the 23,980gal of fuel already in the tanks. The 787’s 33,528gal delivers an 11% boost beyond the performance over a hypothetical 767NG, but does so with 40% more fuel.

    This 767NG appears highly unlikely to come to fruition as the 767’s industrial footprint is now sized smaller for steady low rate output for the US Air Force. More importantly an upgraded 767 would be poised to cannibalize a signficant portion of the 787 business case. Though, if an aircraft derived in the same incremental spirit as Airbus is approaching the A320neo – and Boeing approached the 737NG – and is able to cannibalize the investment of its very expensive all-new majority-composite jetliner, then the 767NG is not a bad idea, just one whose idea has come far too late.

    This post was originally published to the internet between 2007 and 2012. Links, images, and embedded media from that era may no longer function as intended.

    This post originally appeared at Flightglobal.com from 2007 to 2012.

  • A history of strife: Jumbo wingtips and regional stabilizers

    Monday night’s incident at John F. Kennedy International Airport, which featured the wingtip of an Air France A380 catching the horizontal stabilizer of a Delta CRJ700, has been broadcast widely, eliciting gasps and groans with the sight of the regional jet’s rapid 90-degree change of heading. The event has elicited calls to re-evaluate whether or not the A380 is too big to operate at congested airports – ironic as congested airports central to the aircraft’s business model – but while the historical context has largely been limited to reminders of the 1977 Tenerife accident, a far more recent example involving a jumbo and a regional jet offers some context.
    In July 2006 the wingtip of a Thai Airways Boeing 747-400 in Madrid severed the stabilizer of an Air France Régional EMB-135 (full description of the incident) after the 747 inadvertently used a taxiway designed for aircraft no larger than Airbus A321s. The pictures of the aftermath are below.

    ATT00063.jpg
    ATT00060.jpg
    The incident, which was not caught on video, didn’t happen in the US, but did involve the world’s largest commercial aircraft at the time did not elicit the same type of calls for a re-evaluation of using large aircraft at busy airports. This was likely because the taxiway was wasn’t intended for use by a 747 at the time, whereas taxiway A at JFK has been deemed A380 compliant. 
    While the size of the aircraft was – for obvious reasons – a contributing factor in both incidents, the issue appears to be more related to situational awareness about the goings-on around an airport’s taxiways and tarmacs. 
    The A380, 787 and 747-8 all feature airport moving maps on the flight deck with aircraft-centric displays directly integrated into the primary navigation displays and electronic flight bags. On Airbus aircraft the system is dubbed the Onboard Airport Navigation System (OANS) and the Airport Moving Map (AMM) for Boeing aircraft.
    United Airlines Boeing 787 Dreamliner CAE Simulator
    A380-OANS2.jpgMissing from both OANS and AMM is the capability to display the position of other airport traffic providing a broad situational awareness for the crew on the flight deck. According to a feature in this quarter’s Aero, Boeing’s technical magazine, the airframer sees a possible 2015 availability for harnessing precision GPS-derived position data ADS-B to display nearby aircraft on the AMM. 
    While there’s a natural tendency to overreact to an incident involving the largest commercial aircraft in the world striking a smaller regional jet at one of the planet’s busiest airports, a more reasoned incremental approach to solving the problem with technology will enable the best long-term solution. 
    As air traffic worldwide continues to grow at a pace of 5% per year, airport infrastructure hasn’t been able to keep pace as congestion grows. A common refrain at this week’s MRO Americas conference was that as air traffic doubles over the next two decade, incidents and accidents cannot double as well. 
    Jumbo jets have been with us for more than 40 years and wingtips large and small will infrequently make contact with objects providing a large-scale example of Newton’s laws of motion. This likely won’t change, though with the right technology, the frequency certainly can as aviation continues its worldwide growth.

    This post was originally published to the internet between 2007 and 2012. Links, images, and embedded media from that era may no longer function as intended.

    This post originally appeared at Flightglobal.com from 2007 to 2012.

  • Some technical difficuties…

    Greetings from Miami where I’m covering the MRO Americas show along with my colleague Mary Kirby and we’ve been churning through scads of news from the world of aftermarket aircraft support. Unfortunately some connectivity issues (I’m on Mary’s computer at the moment) and some issues with incomplete page loading of FlightBlogger are causing some decidedly frustrating technical difficulties on the front end. We’re working to diagnose the problem, so it should be fixed as soon as possible, but in the meantime, thanks for your understanding and patience. There’s certainly no shortage of things going on across the industry, so consider this an open thread.

    This post was originally published to the internet between 2007 and 2012. Links, images, and embedded media from that era may no longer function as intended.

    This post originally appeared at Flightglobal.com from 2007 to 2012.