Tag: FlightBlogger Archive

  • First Look: On-board the Boeing 747-8 Intercontinental

    PAris-header2-FINAL_560.jpg

    The first 747-8I, RC001, painted in red, orange, white and gray livery, is enroute from Boeing Field to Le Bourget Airport, site of the 2011 Paris Air Show. The aircraft, Boeing’s largest, is set to touch down on French soil a few minutes after 9 AM local time, after which the assembled global media will get its first extensive look inside the updated jumbo, though Flightglobal had an opportunity to look inside the aircraft in the factory during a recent visit to Seattle. 
    This particular aircraft, RC003, is will eventually be registered A6-PFA for the Abu Dhabi Amiri Flight as a head of state Boeing Business Jet for the United Arab Emirates. However, Boeing repeatedly declined to identify the customer for this aircraft, per company policy, though certain marks on the aircraft disclosed the future operator. The aircraft has an empty floor interior at the moment and will be kitted out during its extended trip to a completion center later this year or early next year. The overhead bins, sidewalls and lighting systems will be identical on the airline models, though it’s up to the operators as to how they’ll employ them in service.
    We were provided a look at the creative LED lighting schemes, including one called “Disco Wave” the explanation for which will be evident in the video above. Additionally, we got our first look at the flight deck of the 747-8, which is an evolution of the -400, but you’ll be able to spot the changes in the front office.

    Video originally embedded here

    www.flickr.com
    This Flash-based video is no longer available.

    This post was originally published to the internet between 2007 and 2012. Links, images, and embedded media from that era may no longer function as intended.

    This post originally appeared at Flightglobal.com from 2007 to 2012.

  • Travel Night: IAD-CDG

    PAris-header2-FINAL_560.jpg

    FlightBlogger image

    Travel Night: IAD-CDG, originally uploaded by flightblogger.

    Well we’re back again for another mid-summer air show and it’s full steam ahead into Paris. I’m aboard United 914, a Boeing 777-200ER (N215UA) heading to Charles DeGaulle Airport for the overnight pond crossing. You may also recognize that other Paris-bound jet taxiing off our wing. We are in a 20 minute weather hold and they let us use our phones, so worry not. Though as I watch my time between arrival and transit to the morning’s EADS seminar shrink, I’m reminded that air shows start are structured events, then quickly disintegrate into room temperature jello. This show appears to be no different. My colleague, Mary Kirby, is over in Paris already and we will be bringing you our daily wrap videos from the show along with full end to end coverage with the entire Flightglobal team. Paris 2011 is straight ahead.

    This post was originally published to the internet between 2007 and 2012. Links, images, and embedded media from that era may no longer function as intended.

    This post originally appeared at Flightglobal.com from 2007 to 2012.

  • Report: A350-800 first delivery shifts to 2016, A350-1000 to 2017

    A350-Nose_560.jpg
    With possible delays looming for the A350-900, Airbus is set to delay its two follow on models by two years, reports La Tribune.
    According to the report, the smaller -800, a direct shrink of the -900, is currently due for service entry with Qatar Airways in 2014, but is now expected to slip to 2016 to incorporate additional customer feedback.
    Last week, industry buzz pointed to a coming slip in the -800, in addition to the required changes on the A350-1000’s Rolls-Royce Trent XWB engine, and there were even significant signs pointing to a potential shelving of the -800 in favor of developing the -1000 first. It is believed that customers may have saved the -800 from oblivion, despite a lack of recent order activity for the type as well as conversions to the larger -900.
    Additionally, the slip of the of the A350-1000 was widely expected with the requirement for the updated core, pushing its first delivery, also to Qatar Airways, to 2017. 
    Photo Credit Airbus

    This post was originally published to the internet between 2007 and 2012. Links, images, and embedded media from that era may no longer function as intended.

    This post originally appeared at Flightglobal.com from 2007 to 2012.

  • Photos of Note: Boeing employs 787 to test hybrid laminar flow

    "Boe 03" B787-8 N787BX

    "Boe 03" B787-8 N787BX

    After spending an extended layup in maintenance at Boeing Field, ZA003 emerged with what at first glance looked to be a repair to the composite skin or maybe it was a change to the 787’s HF antenna system? It was neither. The black, green and silver arrangement on the 787’s vertical stabilizer is the first test of hybrid laminar flow control (HLFC) technology being evaluated for use on the 787-9. 
    HLFC is designed to reduce the drag on the leading edges of the horizontal and vertical stabilizers by sucking in the surface airflow through small holes, allowing the boundary layer to remain attached, moving the onset from smooth laminar to turbulent flow further back along the surface. 
    The test patch is installed in a limited area on the leading edge of the vertical stabilizer – which is built by Boeing – one-quarter to one-half of the way up the fin, estimated to be positioned on the adjacent forward panels between ribs 3 and 7, just below the HF antenna.

    Boeing declined to comment on the tests.

    The system, as Aviation Week’s Guy Norris describes, is unlike previous testing by NASA, and the 787’s system is “essentially passive”:

    This is important because passive systems are less complex, and lighter. Active systems, by contrast, require a turbocompressor, or other mechanical device, to suck the air into the wing.

    It is believed Boeing aims to cut drag on the horizontal and vertical stabilizers by 1% for the 787-9, due for entry into service with Air New Zealand in late 2013.
    The system underwent flight testing in early June at San Bernardino Airport in California and was spotted up close while on its visit. Those familiar with the system say the Boeing test includes a primer-colored perforated leading edge, pressure sensors, boundary layer rakes, the suction port at its base.
    Photos Credit SBD Photo

    This post was originally published to the internet between 2007 and 2012. Links, images, and embedded media from that era may no longer function as intended.

    This post originally appeared at Flightglobal.com from 2007 to 2012.

  • 787 Road Trip: Paris, Warsaw, Tokyo, Osaka, Okayama, Hiroshima and Oshkosh (and now Berlin)

    All Nippon Airways Boeing 787 Dreamliner N1006F ZA102
    The 787’s world tour is beginning to take shape as it heads into the summer months. With its visit next week to Paris, ZA001 will then transition to Warsaw, Poland to visit LOT Polish Airlines at its base in Eastern Europe on June 24. The Polish flag carrier will receive its first of eight in April 2012, with a further four between August and November.
    UPDATE: Boeing will take ZA001 to Tegel Airport in Berlin to visit airberlin on June 25. The aircraft will land at 9:00 AM in the German capital.
    Launch customer All Nippon Airways will receive its first visit from ZA002 for Service Ready Operational Validation (SROV) when it arrives in Tokyo on July 4 at 6:30 AM, followed by visits to Osaka-Itami on the 5th, Osaka-Kansai on the 6th, Okayama and Hiroshima on the 7th with a return to Seattle on the 9th.
    The Whitman Regional Airport in Oshkosh, Wisconsin, home to the Experimental Aircraft Association will also receive a visit from the 787 in July during AirVenture, with ZA003 set to attend the air show on July 29. The aircraft has been a sought after guest at the show for the past two years after Airbus brought the A380 to the 8,000ft runway.

    This post was originally published to the internet between 2007 and 2012. Links, images, and embedded media from that era may no longer function as intended.

    This post originally appeared at Flightglobal.com from 2007 to 2012.

  • Quick Take: What 84 A320s and 737s per month mean

    737line-poweron_560.jpg

    Not oversupplying the market, you say?

    Airbus is heading to 42 A320s per month by the end of 2012 with Boeing announcing today it  will follow suit with 42 737s in the first half of 2014. That means 84 narrowbody aircraft per month will be delivered with more than 1000 new narrowbody aircraft per year by the middle of decade.
    The Boeing 2010-2029 Current Market Outlook forecasts a need for 21,160 narrowbody aircraft over the next 20 years. Assuming no new competitors, split between Boeing and Airbus equally, that figure should yield 44.5 deliveries per month to meet market demand. Airbus’s 20 year (2010-2029) Global Market Forecast sees 17,870 narrowbody aircraft being delivered, corresponding to a 50-50 market split with Boeing at 37 deliveries per month
    The Boeing and Airbus definition of narrowbody is an aircraft 100 to 210-seats with a single aisle, which neither airframer covers this full spread in its current product line. This spans from the Embraer E-190 and E-195 all the way up to the Boeing 737-900ER, 757 and Airbus A321.
    These rates assume that Bombardier’s CRJ1000, CS100, C300, Comac’s C919 and ARJ900, Irkut’s MS-21, Mitsubishi’s conceptual MRJ100X and Embraer’s E-190/195 and clean sheet jet will only deliver – at most – an additional 5 aircraft per month against the 42 aircraft per month from Boeing and Airbus.

    The 2011-2030 figures from Boeing will revise this figures upward again, and will be released at the week’s end ahead of the Paris air show, but the assurances of sustainability at the beginning of this industry up cycle are far guaranteed. Airframer’s lament the commoditization of narrowbody aircraft, creating a crop of amorphous and indistinguishable products, a trend likely reinforced by an oversupply of aircraft.
    The sustainability of these rate increases will be a central question in the coming years, and with the certainty of the industry’s exogenous events to try and throw it off course, the huge output growth decisions of Boeing and Airbus will guide the fortunes of the industry.

    This post was originally published to the internet between 2007 and 2012. Links, images, and embedded media from that era may no longer function as intended.

    This post originally appeared at Flightglobal.com from 2007 to 2012.

  • Aircraft Design 101: What is Maximum Take-Off Weight?

    Emirates Boeing 777-300ER A6-ECZ

    As you may have noticed, I am not an aerospace engineer. In fact, I’m not an engineer of any discipline. Though over the last several years, I’ve sought to learn more about aircraft performance, payload capability and design to better understand the industry I cover and I was keen to share what I had learned. Many of you are aircraft designers, so your job is to check my work and recommend where this can be clearer. For those of you are like me – learning – I hope this will become an accessible reference. So, today I give you what may be the first installment of what may become a periodic series: Aircraft Design 101 (as told by a non-engineer). Physics for Poets, if you will.

    Every aircraft has a Maximum Take-off Weight (MTOW), which is dictated by the structural capacity of the aircraft. Though within the aircraft’s maximum allowed weight are several different elements, each one contributing to the overall performance of the aircraft. If we think of MTOW as a glass which cannot be overfilled, inside sits layers of an alphabet soup of additional weights that determine how much an aircraft can carry and how far it can be carried.

    Let’s take a large jetliner for example and load it to its maximum takeoff weight the moment it begins its takeoff roll. At this particular moment the total weight, or gross weight, of the aircraft is the sum of the aircraft, the amount of fuel it’s carrying and what it’s carrying. This is also known as the Take-Off Weight (TOW) That is of course an over simplification, but these are the three key ingredients to understanding how much an aircraft weights.

    Before any items are installed that make the aircraft usable as a commercial transport, the aircraft itself its made up of the airframe, furnishings, the systems and its propulsion. The sum of these three items are the Manufacturers Empty Weight (MEW). The MEW also includes, for example, hydraulic fluid, which is found in a “closed” system aboard the aircraft and not consumed.

    As it readies for revenue service, many items are added to the aircraft for it to be missionized. For example, the seats, emergency equipment and other consumable fluids such as engine oil, toilet chemicals and fluids, as well as the fuel that can’t reach the pickups in the tank, also known as unusable fuel. Naturally, you’re not going anywhere without the flight and cabin crew and their baggage. All together, you add the weight of these items to MEW to get the Operational Empty Weight (OEW or OWE) of the aircraft.

    Aircraft-Weights.jpgWhile it’s parked at the gate and you’re watching your ride from the terminal windows, the aircraft is loaded with fresh catering and potable water, your pre-flight newspaper, any pantry equipment and extra crew. Add these weights to the OWE and you have the aircraft’s Dry Operating Weight (DOW).

    Once everyone is boarded comfortably ready to fly along with their baggage in the overhead bins and in the cargo hold, that weight is added with the pallets with revenue cargo that are flying along with you to your destination. All these items are called the Traffic Load (TL). The TL is then added to the DOW to yield the Zero Fuel Weight (ZFW), before an ounce of usable fuel has been put into the tanks. Every item into the ZFW that leaves the gate will arrive with you at your destination.

    For the sake of this scenario, with everything loaded on board, now comes the the Jet A. The weight of all that gas you’ll need for your trip is made up of three elements. The first is your reserve fuel, enough for 30 minutes of cruise during the day or 45 minutes at night, which when added to your ZFW will give you your Landing Weight (LW).

    The distance you’ll fly and the fuel you’ll need to fly there directly is called your Trip Fuel and is the largest portion of the fuel weight. As noted early, when the aircraft begins its take-off roll it is at its Take-off Weight (TOW), but when it pushes back from the gate it may exceed the MTOW, because the Maximum Design Taxi Weight (MTW) is higher than the MTOW. That’s because your pilots have requested extra Taxi Fuel that will be burned while moving the aircraft from the gate to the take-off position.

    Returning to the idea of the aircraft as a vessel that cannot be overfilled by the sum of the different elements. In a perfectly efficient use of the aircraft, the aircraft would depart the gate at MTW, leave the runway at its MTOW, and land at its LW just before using any reserve fuel. In an operational setting, Trip Fuel and Traffic Load are the two variable elements. On a short flight, less Trip Fuel is required, allowing the carrying of additional revenue cargo for example, along with the full load of passengers and their baggage. 

    Chart Credit Airbus

    This post was originally published to the internet between 2007 and 2012. Links, images, and embedded media from that era may no longer function as intended.

    This post originally appeared at Flightglobal.com from 2007 to 2012.

  • Movie Monday – June 13 – Inside the 1967 Paris Air Show

    The 1967 Paris Air Show featured the presence of the largest commercial aircraft in service to date. That aircraft was the Douglas DC-8-61, capable of carry more than 250 passengers in its super-stretched fuselage. 

    Movie Monday runs significantly longer today for your nostalgia and procrastinating pleasure with nearly an hour and a half of footage from the 1967 Le Bourget biennial. Each movie provides a different perspective on the show. The first, running 24 minutes, is from a US perspective that captures a more light hearted look at the show.
    The second (below the fold) runs just about an hour, is a review of all the technology on display including (and with particular focus on) Soviet aerospace technology and the advancements in the development of the triple supersonic transports: Concorde, Tu-144 and Boeing 2707
    Interviews with suppliers, airlines, manufacturers and pilots are not entirely dissimilar from how the industry covers air show today, but you’ll see an important contrast. The Cold War-era Paris Air Show was rooted in national representation and image; Soviet, US and European “propaganda” by any other name. Aviation, in short, was just one arm of the ambassador’s global reach. 
    The fall of the Berlin Wall, which is as many years removed from the 1967 show as it is from today, aerospace is is again influenced by the machinations of superpowers along side the different commercial players. The 2011 show will see China’s Comac making its first C919 marketing pitch outside of its borders, the rise of another superpower flexing its aerospace muscle on the global stage.

    This post was originally published to the internet between 2007 and 2012. Links, images, and embedded media from that era may no longer function as intended.

    This post originally appeared at Flightglobal.com from 2007 to 2012.

  • Ethiopian gets first 787 in January, readies for Guangzhou

    ET787-LN39.jpg
    A report out from the Centre for Asia Pacific Aviation this morning says Ethiopian Airlines is set to receive its first 787 in January 2012 and will first deploy the 270-seat jet from Addis Ababa to Guangzhou, China. Further, after taking delivery of the aircraft (Airplane 39) – currently sitting at position three in final assembly in Everett, Washington – will be flown to Washington’s Dulles International Airport on a publicity stop on its way to Addis Ababa. Most of the 10 787s the carrier has on order will be used on Ethiopia to Europe routes, replacing older 757s and 767s. 

    This post was originally published to the internet between 2007 and 2012. Links, images, and embedded media from that era may no longer function as intended.

    This post originally appeared at Flightglobal.com from 2007 to 2012.

  • Boeing puts original 787 tooling on eBay, yours for $14,999.99

    MaxMove-787-eBay.jpg
    Off to the left wing of a 787 at position three inside Boeing’s 40-26 final assembly line, you’ll find a 70,500lb piece of tooling called the Max Move. Designed to lift and install General Electric GEnx-1B and Rolls-Royce Trent 1000 engines into position for installation under the wing, this particular Max Move was built in Sweden in 2007 and can lift a hefty 31,000lbs. It was part of the company’s repertoire of ultra-lean tooling to minimize the recurring cost of the 787 and reduce reliance on legacy equipment such as overhead cranes. 

    Now Boeing has put up the MaxMove up for sale on eBay! The starting bid is a mere $14,999 and you’ve got until next Tuesday to submit your bid. Bidadoo, who is running the auction for Boeing, is still waiting on the first bid, so this Swedish robo-tooling could be yours for a steal.

    MaxMove-787_560.jpg

    From what I understand from program sources, the Max Mover was used once in 2007 to install the Trent 1000s for ZA001 ahead of the July rollout, but has laid dormant off to the side on the factory floor ever since. Boeing has since opted for a much leaner pylon winch system to load engines, which has yielded significantly faster engine installation times. It’s not the first time Boeing has shifted its original tooling plan, the company now uses legacy overhead cranes to move 787 wings into position for final body join, rather than mobile floor tooling.
    The MaxMove needs to be out of the factory by July 1, so make sure your PayPal account is ready to roll.
    Lastly, a very special thank you to the person who pointed this out to me.

    This post was originally published to the internet between 2007 and 2012. Links, images, and embedded media from that era may no longer function as intended.

    This post originally appeared at Flightglobal.com from 2007 to 2012.